Judge Denies Trump’s Request to Halt Proceedings, Sentencing Set for Friday
Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan has denied former President Donald Trump’s request to indefinitely postpone proceedings in his criminal case, setting the stage for sentencing this Friday. The decision comes despite efforts by Trump’s legal team to delay the process pending appeal.
The case, which involves allegations of falsifying business records related to hush money payments, has been a focal point of legal and political debate. Trump’s lawyers argue that presidential immunity should protect him from criminal proceedings, while prosecutors urge for prompt sentencing, citing public interest and the importance of finality in criminal matters.
Trump responded to the ruling on his social media platform, Truth Social, expressing concerns about the impact on his presidency. His spokesperson, Steven Cheung, criticized the case as a “Witch Hunt.”
Despite the judge’s decision, Trump’s legal team has filed appeal paperwork, potentially setting the stage for the case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court. The possibility of the case remaining unresolved during a potential Trump presidency has raised questions about the Justice Department’s stance on presidential immunity from criminal proceedings.
Judge Merchan suggested unconditional discharge as a possible solution, emphasizing the importance of finalizing the matter through sentencing. However, Trump’s lawyers continue to argue against the ruling, citing legal errors.
The case stems from an alleged scheme to conceal hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. If convicted, Trump could face various punishments, including potential prison time.
Michael Cohen, a key witness in the case, has expressed support for a decision that would result in no punishment for Trump. The sentencing, initially set for July, has been postponed multiple times.
As the legal drama unfolds, both the defense and prosecution are expected to discuss the future of the case post-election. The outcome of this high-profile case could have significant implications for the upcoming presidential race and the broader legal landscape surrounding presidential immunity.
By
