In the bustling metropolis of Los Angeles, billions of dollars have been poured into efforts to address homelessness. Despite this significant financial investment, outdated and error-plagued computer systems are often a stumbling block in the quest to provide even the most basic form of assistance, such as locating an available shelter bed. In a world where booking a hotel or renting a car is just a few taps away on a mobile device, it is astonishing that a comprehensive listing of available shelter beds in Los Angeles County remains a distant dream. This county, after all, is home to more than one in five unhoused individuals in the United States. The technological shortcomings are glaringly obvious, with systems that do not communicate with each other, filled with inaccurate data, and a general disarray that leaves everyone clueless about the actual situation.
Take, for instance, the grim scene at a filthy encampment in Silver Lake, where Sara Reyes, executive director of the SELAH Neighborhood Homeless Coalition, and her volunteers distribute water, socks, and food to those in need. One individual appeared unconscious, raising the question: How can such an immense problem be combated without reliable data to define its scope? An annual tally of the homeless population in the city indicated a slight decline, but the reliability of this data is under scrutiny. Tents and encampments are visible almost everywhere, painting a different picture. Earlier this year, Reyes noted that three to five homeless individuals die daily on the streets of L.A., highlighting the dire consequences of these inefficiencies.
In a bold move, Governor Gavin Newsom recently ordered state agencies to begin removing homeless encampments from state land. This decision follows a Supreme Court ruling that allows cities to enforce bans on sleeping in public spaces. The lack of uniform practices for caseworkers to collect and input data into databases compounds the problem. Notes taken on paper are re-entered multiple times because Los Angeles County uses a proprietary data system that does not interface with the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS). Sam Matonik, associate director of data at People Assisting the Homeless, a major service provider, confirmed this inefficiency, which only adds to the administrative burden.
There is some hope on the horizon, though. Bevin Kuhn, acting deputy chief of analytics for the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), revealed that work is underway to create a database of 23,000 beds by the end of the year as part of a technology upgrade. While the aim is to enter data into the system within 72 hours, this benchmark is not always met. The transient nature of homeless individuals makes follow-up services a challenge, but a new feature aims to create a map of places where an individual has been encountered, thereby narrowing the search for case managers.
If enough agencies and providers participate, this new software could offer a secondary benefit: producing analytical information and data visualizations. This would spotlight patterns such as the movement of homeless individuals around the county or concentrations of where they have gathered. Such insights could be invaluable for devising more effective strategies to combat homelessness.
While Los Angeles grapples with its technological inefficiencies and disjointed data systems, the human cost mounts daily. The hope is that with improved technology and better data integration, the city can make strides in addressing this pressing humanitarian issue. Until then, the sight of tents and encampments will remain a sobering reminder of the work that lies ahead.
By
