Bedgear’s M3 Performance Mattress Offers Customizable Sleep Experience
Bedgear, a company founded in 2009 specializing in innovative sleep products for active individuals, has introduced its M3 Performance mattress. This hybrid mattress features a modular design with customizable firmness levels, making it an attractive option for couples with different sleep preferences.
The 12-inch M3 Performance mattress combines foam layers and pocket coils, topped with a removable, machine-washable cover made from Bedgear’s proprietary “Ver-Tex” material. Three ventilated foam comfort layers provide body contouring and motion transfer reduction, while modular pocket coils, dubbed “independent suspension,” are available in four firmness options.
One unique aspect of the M3 is its assembly process. The mattress arrives in four vacuum-sealed boxes, requiring customers to place the foam chassis, insert coils, and secure the comfort layer and cover. While this may be daunting for some, it allows for future customization.
During a three-week trial, the mattress received mixed reviews for comfort. The plush side was found to be too soft for some, while the medium-firm side was considered too rigid. However, sleep quality measurements showed improvement over average scores.
Heat dissipation tests revealed higher-than-average surface temperatures, though the mattress cooled down rapidly. Edge support was noted as a weakness due to foam borders instead of coils extending to the edges.
The M3 Performance mattress comes with a 30-day return window for opened mattresses and a 10-year limited warranty. While it offers unique customization options, potential buyers should consider factors such as the involved setup process and restrictive return policy.
Priced as Bedgear’s most expensive mattress, the M3 Performance faces competition from other customizable options like the Sleep Number i8 and Naturepedic EOS. It may be best suited for couples seeking personalized comfort, cold sleepers, and lightweight side sleepers, while hot sleepers and those requiring strong edge support might need to explore alternatives.