Generative AI has quickly emerged as a hot-button issue, particularly in the art world. The controversy is not centered on the quality of the “art” produced by these AI systems, but rather on the existential threat they pose to human artists. Many artists have already found themselves out of work, replaced by cheaper, automated alternatives. This displacement has sparked heated discussions about job security, economic inequality, and the ethical considerations of AI technology.
Enter Mira Murati, the Chief Technology Officer at OpenAI, whose comments have only served to fan the flames. Murati’s public relations efforts could be likened to a bull in a china shop—bold and occasionally disastrous. At a recent interview at The Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth University, she made a statement that left many aghast: artists who lose their jobs to AI probably deserved it and should never have been employed in the first place. While this may sound like an inadvertently harsh critique, it underscores a larger, more troubling sentiment in the tech industry.
Murati didn’t stop at artists. She also addressed the broader job market, predicting that many roles will transform or vanish entirely due to AI advancements. According to Murati, AI will render “strictly repetitive” jobs obsolete. While her predictions were somewhat vague, they align with the views of many economists. A report from the UK’s Institute for Public Policy Research has already sounded the alarm, warning of a looming “jobs apocalypse.” The report identifies positions involving repetitive cognitive tasks, such as customer service and administrative roles, as particularly vulnerable to automation through large language models like ChatGPT.
Murati’s remarks epitomize the casual detachment with which many tech leaders approach the topic of job automation. Her bluntness—while arguably refreshing—also highlights the fatalistic attitude prevalent among those spearheading AI adoption. Job losses are an inevitable consequence, and according to Murati, it’s better to accept this reality sooner rather than later.
Adding fuel to the fire, Murati faced scrutiny earlier this year over the training data used for OpenAI’s new video-generating AI called Sora. Questions about the ethical sourcing of data and the potential biases embedded in these AI systems remain unanswered, further complicating the debate around job displacement.
As AI continues to evolve, the ethical and economic implications are likely to become even more pronounced. While the potential for job creation exists, it seems equally plausible that many will find their skills rendered obsolete. As Murati and other tech leaders push forward with their AI projects, the rest of us are left grappling with the fallout. Whether or not those displaced “deserve” their fate, the reality is that the job market is undergoing a seismic shift, and society must prepare for the consequences.
By
