Boston University’s recent proposal to consider using generative AI to replace striking graduate students has raised eyebrows and sparked controversy. The suggestion came from a dean at the university in an email to faculty as a way to manage course discussion sections and labs affected by the ongoing protests of the Boston University Graduate Worker Union. While the email contained some conventional recommendations for managing workloads in the absence of grad students, the idea of using AI to provide feedback and facilitate discussions on readings or assignments left many scratching their heads.
Generative AI tools have undoubtedly revolutionized various industries, including academia, but the notion of replacing protesting graduate employees with AI “scabs” is a novel and somewhat startling concept. The graduate worker union’s strike, which commenced on March 20, is part of a broader trend of protests by student workers across the country who argue that their stipends are insufficient given the rising costs of higher education. The proposal to use AI as a substitute for striking workers represents a significant departure from previous responses to such protests and raises questions about the role of automation in higher education.
The suggestion to utilize AI in place of human educators has prompted skepticism and concern among faculty members at Boston University. One anonymous faculty member expressed surprise at the unconventional recommendation, particularly in light of the university’s previous discussions about preventing students from misusing generative AI tools. The faculty member described the proposal as “demoralizing,” highlighting the potential implications of replacing educators with automation on morale and academic integrity.
The use of generative AI in educational settings has been a subject of ongoing debate, with proponents touting its potential to enhance learning experiences and streamline administrative tasks. However, the idea of deploying AI to circumvent labor disputes raises complex ethical and practical considerations. The suggestion to replace striking graduate students with AI reflects broader concerns about the impact of automation on employment and the future of work in an increasingly digital world.
In conclusion, Boston University’s contemplation of using generative AI to address the impact of the graduate worker union strike underscores the evolving relationship between technology, labor, and education. While AI has the potential to revolutionize teaching and learning, its deployment as a replacement for human workers raises important questions about equity, labor rights, and the role of technology in academia. As universities grapple with the challenges of a rapidly changing landscape, finding a balance between innovation and ethical considerations will be essential in shaping the future of higher education.
By
